Pinhole photo by Anders Blomqvist printed as Kallitypes

Anders Blomqvist is a Swedish photographer. He is also a maker, and founder & admin of a narrow, but very popular and thriving facebook group that brings 3D printing and analog photography together.

I have been. following his work on Instagram and other social media for a while and I am truly fascinated by his pinhole photos taken with different home made contraptions. .

When I saw this specific photo, it immediately resonated with my obsession for abandoned places, the URBEX sense was triggered. That context, paired with a very moody picture, taken on analog film with a home made camera... It ticked all the boxes for me and I reached out to Anders and asked for permission to make alternative photography prints from the photo.

What better to do with this picture, than to print it using techniques and chemistry from the previous century?

(See links to his social media at the end of the article!)

Abandoned building - digital scan of analog negative- Photo by Anders Blomqvist.

My Kallitype process

My immediate thought was to print this as a Kallitype, a silver and Iron based process invented in 1860s. It makes black/white prints, but the choice of a developer can change the color temperature quite dramatically. Kallitype prints can also be toned with a range of chemicals to alter the print, and some toners also make the print more durable.

Making a digital negative

Blasphemy! - Digital negative, enlarged and printed on transparent plastic material

A digital step in the analog process? Purists might frown at this, and would prefer to contact print real analog negatives onto the paper. In the not so distant future I will probably fall into the deep rabbit hole of wet plate collodion photography, from where I will never return.

However, until then - making a digital negative and to print that onto a transparency has so many advantages it’s very hard to forego this opportunity for creativity. When I make the negative, I can use darkroom techniques like dodge & burn, I can add contrast - exactly like I would with filters using a darkroom enlarger.

Making a digital negative for contact printing is a science of it is own, and there are countless semi-scientific ways to go about it, that all seem to aim at making the final print exactly as close as possible to the negative.

My approach is more organic and iterative, as I am not aiming to get a 1:1 representation of the photo but to rather convey a mood or express my interpretation of a subject. I will make two to four test prints iteratively, adjusting the negative as I go making sure it comes out to my liking.

For this specific print, I wanted to preserve the depth in the foggy trees, but also make the interesting foreground pop a bit. I wanted the house to stand out a bit against the background so I selectively added more brightness to the sky around the building.

Selecting the paper

For this print, I chose the Bergger Cot 320. It is a very robust and thick paper, with a smooth surface that I know works well with this process.

Coating the paper

I coat the paper with Kallitype sensitizer using a glass rod. I actually make these rods myself from chemistry lab equipment and a special cutter. I can get any length I need. I made a 20cm rod for this print that matches the exact height. I will of course re-use this rod for other prints of the same hight.

Exposure

Kallitypes do not need a lot of light compared to other processes like salt print or cyanotypes. With my exposure unit - a body tanner from the 90s - I time my exposure at 25-15 seconds after the bulb has reached full power.

Development, fixing and wash


The Development of a Kallitype is a spectacular phenomenon. After exposure, you can see a faint trace of the image on the paper, often called a “whisper”. When the developer is poured over, the image appears instantly almost like magic. I develop and agitate the print for 8 minutes.

I currently use 3 developers

  • Sodium Acetate, prints a neutral black print

  • Ammonium Citrate, prints a warm red

  • A 50/50 mix of these two developers. A very interesting combination that almost split tones the print by leaving some warmth in the highlights but makes the dark parts cold black

Four variants from the same negative developed with different developing chemicals.

The print is cleared in a bath of distilled water with a pinch of citric acid for 4-5 minutes. It is then made insensitive to further exposure by light by a 5% sodium thiosulphate solution. This fixer can damage the print if not completely rinsed out, so I use a hypo clearing bath that helps reduce wash time for the final print. This process should be fairly well known for anyone who have spent some time in a dark room

After that, all the chemicals needs to be rinsed out of the paper, so the print is given a 30-40 minute wash.

The results

Final kallitype print

Anders Blomqvist

  • Instagram https://www.instagram.com/exposed_material/

  • 3D Models for Analog photography; https://www.printables.com/social/10782-spotmatic/models



#Failcorner - Saltprint lack of agitation and pizza marks


Simple, they said! One of the most straightforward alternative processes to get started. Well, I can tell you otherwise. Salt prints might be an easy way into alternative photographic methods, but to tame the process and get consistent results, that is a different matter altogether.

I have made many mistakes over the last couple of weeks, and instead of showing only my successful prints, I will try to share some fails and how they look. Hopefully, somebody can learn something, and my waster of paper and chemistry can come to some benefit.

So let’s look at the two prints above.

So, who ordered those black vertical dots I have circled out on the left print? These are called “pizza wheel marks” and result from the Epson P800 printer’s paper advance mechanism. People all over the internet complain about this. Just google “Epson pizza wheel,” and you can read for hours.

The printer has wheels with tiny spikes that grab the paper to move it forward. For robust paper and matte surfaces, this is not a problem. But, with glossy paper and transparencies, it’s a different story. The internet has told me to try different settings on the printer, load the transparency differently. I’m still working on this and have not reached a conclusion or solution yet. I certainly hope to get this fixed since the only alternative is to swap the printer for a canon that uses a vacuum to hold the paper - or go forward with analog negatives.

The next fail in these prints is the brown marks in the highlights of the left photo. If you leave the paper in the first salt wash without agitation, the Silver nitrate that accumulates in the water will stain the print this way. This issue is fixed if you babysit it for the 4-minute wash with constant and gentle agitation. It’s also a good idea to swap the water frequently, and since saltwater is cheap, I decided to remove the variable from the equation altogether and now use fresh 5% saltwater for each print.


Getting things done. 5am photography and hacking life.

“A life hack (or life hacking) is any trick, shortcut, skill, or novelty method that increases productivity and efficiency, in all walks of life. The term was primarily used by computer experts who suffer from information overload or those with a playful curiosity in the ways they can accelerate their workflow in ways other than programming.!”

Taken with my Hasselblad 500cm on Kodak Gold. Scanned. Converted to Black and white. Printed as digital negative

It’s actually not very difficult to get up at 5 am. The difficult part of the habit to make hitting the sheets at 10 pm. Luckily the process is self-enforcing. After a couple of days, you are so tired at 10 am that it is autopilot from thereon. What helped me become a morning person is to see this as a trade. I can trade 3 hours of time of mindless social media and Netflix evening time, for 3 hours of productive - actually getting something done time in the morning.

This Wednesday I got this cyanotype done, I also got time to make a pot of my favorite caffeinated brew and put together a video for my youtube channel describing the process. All before 8am and just in time for my real job.

Going nuts with Cyanotypes #1 Chestnuts

The playfulness, more kitchen sink and less “scientific” approach to printing is probably why I make cyanotypes even as I explore more and more alternative photographic processes. My recent experiments are toning prints in extracts from acorn and horse chestnut.

Most practitioners of this craft are known to submerge their hard work into bleach, watch the print almost fade and then pray to an appropriate deity for the tones to re-appear in a different hue.

I have found that a reverse toning process - soaking in toner first, and then in the bleach works well for chestnut and acorn. See my other post for an example and time-lapse.

For this print I have used chestnut husks only and it gently alters the highlights towards red/pink and changes the blue just slightly away from the well know Prussian and leaves a sligh pink stain on the paper.

Toner

  • Roughly chop or blend about 30 grams of chestnut husks, watch out for spikes!

  • Add 300 ml / 1 cup of boiling water

  • Let steep and cool for 24 hours

Process

This is my “reverse” toner process where I soak first and bleach second

  • Soak the print in water so that the paper is wet before you start toning

  • Soak the print in the toner for 60 minutes, you can dilute the toner slightly to get more liquid

  • Make a bleach solution of sodium carbonate - a bit weaker than you would use to bleach a cyanotype before toning

  • Let the print soak in the bleach and watch it not fade but change tone directly.

  • Pull it out and wash it when you are happy with the result

Reverse toning cyanotypes

The usual way to tone cyanotypes involves a bleach, watching the print like a hawk while it slowly disappears into magenta then yellow, pull it out of the bleach, wash it, and then cross your fingers that you did not take it too far. The print is then put into whatever a tannin-rich liquid. A goat is then sacrificed to make sure that the tonal range returns from its pale state.

(Artwork in video by https://www.instagram.com/yvonnewartiainen/)

By accident, I found a much safer way to tone prints that seem to work with some toners. I have tried this for chestnut and acorn. The process is easy. Simply soak the print in the tannin-rich liquid first, and then put it in bleach second.

The print does not fade when it goes into the bleach. Instead, it slowly changes to the desired tone, and you can pull it out when you are happy with the result.

Toning Cyanotypes with nickel (ii) sulphate

Nickel as a toning option for Cyanotype is not often mentioned. I first noticed it when reading Mike Ware - the “Cyanotype II” inventor’s extensive book on Cyanotypes.

The source for Mike Ware’s book is research done by Holtzman H, and his article “Alkali resistance of the Iron blues” published in Industrial Engineering Chemistry 37, 9 (1945).

As many of you probably have noticed, alkali buffered papers work really bad for cyanotypes - and exposing the print to an alkaline solution like bleach or sodium carbonate is a part of the process for “bleach first” toners. Nickel toning was/is used to enable Prussian blue to be used in alkaline environments. For cyanotype printers - another interesting side effect of Nickel, is the green/turquoise tone it makes on the print

The results are striking, even with weak solutions. After about 15 minutes of toning in a 1% bath a split-tone happens where highlights are drawn against a green/turquoise that works really well with the dark Prussian blue.

Mike Ware suggests Toning with a 10% solution and after one hour of toning the entire image should be shifted towards green - I will absolutely try that in a later experiment.

Artwork by Flugswamp. X marks the s pot. Print on the right toned with Nickel (II) Sulphate 1% ~ 15 minutes